Supreme Court Shocker: Trump’s 1798 Law to Deport Venezuelan Gang Members Gets Green Light

Trump’s 1798 Law to Deport Venezuelan Gang Members Gets Green Light

In a jaw-dropping decision that’s lighting up headlines and sparking fierce debate, the U.S. Supreme Court has handed President Donald Trump a major victory, ruling 5-4 to uphold his use of the dusty, 227-year-old Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan gang members.

Buckle up—this ruling is shaking the nation, overturning a lower court’s block and giving Trump sweeping wartime powers to send noncitizens packing, no questions asked. But here’s the kicker: not everyone’s cheering.

Trump’s 1798 Law to Deport Venezuelan Gang Members Gets Green Light

The controversial move, greenlit on Monday night, lets the Trump administration fast-track the removal of individuals tagged as part of the notorious Tren de Aragua gang—a group the White House claims is waging “irregular warfare” against the U.S.

Posts on X are buzzing with reactions, with users like @SamUSOH hailing it as a “Massive Victory for Trump” and @vilas_sp7 calling it a “big win for border control.” Yet, the narrow decision—split with Justice Amy Coney Barrett siding with the court’s liberals in dissent—has critics crying foul over due process and human rights.

Read More: Hollywood Locked Out: China Slams Door on US Films in Explosive Tariff War Twist!

It all started back on March 15 when Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime relic from 1798 last used to intern Japanese, Italian, and German immigrants during World War II. His target?

Hundreds of Venezuelan migrants accused of gang ties, shipped off to El Salvador’s “Terrorism Confinement Center” faster than you can say “deportation.” The administration argues these alleged Tren de Aragua members are a national security threat, pointing to tattoos and social media posts as evidence—though some deportees, like a soccer player with a Real Madrid crown tattoo, swear they’re innocent.

A federal judge, James Boasberg, tried to slam the brakes on this deportation express, issuing orders to halt the flights and bring planes back mid-air. But Trump’s team didn’t flinch—two planes with 238 men landed in El Salvador anyway, sparking outrage and a legal showdown.

Now, the Supreme Court has lifted Boasberg’s block, saying challenges belong in Texas, not D.C., and giving Trump the go-ahead—with one catch: deportees must get notice and a shot to fight their removal. Too little, too late for those already gone?

The internet’s ablaze with takes. “Deport away,” cheered @CKen410863 on X, while news outlets like Reuters report the court’s limits—judicial review is required, and detainees need a heads-up. Critics, including the ACLU, are fuming, arguing the Act was never meant for peacetime gang crackdowns. “Nazis got better treatment under this law,” snapped Judge Patricia Millett during earlier hearings, a sentiment echoing across rights groups who say many deportees were misidentified—some nabbed just for wearing Chicago Bulls jerseys or inking the wrong tat.

So, what’s next? At least 137 have already been deported, and more could follow as Trump doubles down on his hardline immigration stance. Is this a bold move to secure the border or a dangerous overreach of presidential power? The nation’s watching, the courts are scrambling, and the debate’s just heating up. Stay tuned—this story’s far from over!

Read More:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top