Former Uvalde school police chief Adrian Gonzales goes on trial for child endangerment over delayed response to 2022 Robb Elementary shooting.
As of January 6, 2026, jury selection has begun in the criminal trial of Adrian Gonzales, the former Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District police chief charged with child endangerment and abandonment in connection with the botched response to the 2022 Robb Elementary School shooting. Gonzales, one of the first officers on scene during the May 24 massacre that killed 19 children and two teachers, is accused of failing to promptly confront the gunman.
Charges and Allegations Against Gonzales
Gonzales faces 29 counts of child endangerment and abandonment, stemming from his role as on-scene commander. Prosecutors allege he delayed treating the situation as an active shooter for over an hour, instructing officers to wait for tactical gear while children remained trapped with the gunman.
Key evidence includes bodycam footage showing Gonzales arriving early, checking his phone for updates on his stepchild (safe at another school), and prioritizing perimeter setup over immediate entry. If convicted, he could face significant prison time.
Trial Proceedings: Jury Selection and Venue Challenges
The trial, presided over by Judge Sid Harle in Del Rio (moved from Uvalde for impartiality), began with jury selection from a pool of 300 potential jurors. Opening statements are expected later this week, with testimony potentially lasting weeks.
Gonzales pleaded not guilty, with his defense arguing he followed flawed training and was not the ultimate decision-maker. He remains free on bond.
Broader Context: The Uvalde Shooting Response Failure
The 2022 Robb Elementary attack exposed systemic law enforcement failures, with nearly 400 officers waiting 77 minutes before breaching the classroom. Investigations criticized hesitation, poor communication, and leadership breakdowns. Gonzales was fired months later, along with other officers.
Families of victims have pursued civil settlements, with Uvalde reaching a $2 million agreement and Texas DPS paying additional sums.
Reactions from Families and the Community
Victims’ relatives, attending court, express mixed emotions: hope for justice tempered by pain. One parent stated:
“This trial won’t bring back our babies, but accountability matters.”
Online, reactions are polarized—support for officers facing scrutiny versus demands for consequences in one of America’s deadliest school shootings.
Conclusion
The trial of Adrian Gonzales represents a rare criminal prosecution of law enforcement in a mass shooting response, potentially setting precedents for officer accountability. As proceedings unfold, the Uvalde community—and nation—watches for closure in a tragedy that exposed deep flaws.
What are your thoughts on holding officers criminally accountable in such cases? Share below.